Subscribe to RSS
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Join us for:

Unsubscribe
Manage Your Subscription
Photo By: Scott Williamson/www.photodesignstudios.com; car courtesy Petersen Automotive Museum.. 
Left
Right

Collection Classics: Jet Set

Ezra Dyer

April 1, 2008

Nobody would argue with the statement that the piston-driven internal combustion engine is the undisputed champion of automotive power. While there have been some interesting alternatives, most notably the Wankel rotary still embraced by Mazda in the RX-8, no other technology has seriously challenged the piston engine’s hegemony—which is why the motor in a Bugatti Veyron is fundamentally just a more elaborate version of the Briggs & Stratton in a lawnmower.

But in the early 1960s, Chrysler seemed on the verge of delivering a new type of power, and a new kind of driving experience, to America. The jet engines developed during World War II posed an intriguing question for automotive engineers, namely: What if you harnessed a jet’s kinetic energy and, instead of producing thrust, you used that power to turn a second turbine and then a propshaft? You’d have a jet car—the romance and excitement of that concept enticed Chrysler to devote years of work developing the turbine engine.

There were technical hurdles to overcome. One of the problems concerned drivability: early prototypes took as long as seven seconds to reach full throttle from idle. Excessive heat was an issue. Eventually, emissions standards would pose a dilemma for any internal combustion engine, and on that front piston engines had a lengthy developmental head start.

Nevertheless, the turbine had many advantages as well. It was innately simpler than a piston engine, using only one ignition plug and needing no oil changes or antifreeze. It delivered instant heat upon startup—definitely a boon to anyone in a northern climate. Because there were no reciprocating parts, it was inherently smooth. It ran on essentially any combustible, from jet fuel to diesel. Moreover, from a performance standpoint, it was a torque monster. When Chrysler put the engine into limited production in the 1963 Turbine Car, it made a modest 130 hp, but a colossal 425 ft lbs of torque.

Chrysler built 50 (not including five prototypes) of the two-door, Ghia-bodied Turbine Cars, which served two main purposes for the company. First of all, the cars were real-world test beds for the technology, a means for Chrysler to reap consumer feedback (cars were loaned to households selected to represent a wide range of driving situations). Second—and maybe just as important—putting these sexy, futuristic vehicles on the road was a brilliant publicity move.

"Chrysler tried harder than any other firm to make the turbine work, and I think people admired them for that," says Leslie Kendall, curator of the Petersen Automotive Museum, which is home to the car featured on these pages. "They were hoping it would rub off on the rest of the line." This real-world beta test and publicity stunt was not unlike the program GM ran for the EV1 electric car and Honda is rolling out for its new FCX Clarity fuel-cell car. Except, instead of offering leases, Chrysler loaned the Turbine Cars for free, in exchange for detailed feedback on the experience.

The company learned that while the turbine was close to feasibility, it still had a few technical issues to overcome. "It would’ve been really expensive to produce," Kendall says. "And people had to get used to the driving experience—it could accelerate quickly, but it wouldn’t burn rubber. And when you took your foot off the accelerator, it wanted to keep going. You went through brakes more quickly than would’ve been considered acceptable." Indeed, turbines don’t really like to go slow, and the Turbine Car’s motor idled at 18,000 rpm.

Page:  1  |  2
Print ArticleEmail ArticleAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.us